|
It is hard to be
confident that President Bush will stick by his word. He stepped right
up to the plate following his reelection and the death of Palestinian
President Arafat, with words we longed to hear. Now we must watch his
actions, encourage his best inclinations, and be ready to counter the
hawkish Jewish and Christian supporters of the status quo, especially
in Congress.
The president
started fast, in part motivated by the need to garner international
help for the Iraq morass. As Congress was rushing to finish the lame
duck session and get home, the President notified the lawmakers that
the administration would bypass all congressional restrictions on aid
to the Palestinian Authority and give $20 million directly to them to
pay salaries. Concurrently, the White House initiated, and the Senate
unanimously agreed to, a leadership-sponsored resolution supporting
the joint statement of President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony
Blair. They recognized that much of the newly opened opportunity would
depend on how the administration responded in the first weeks of the
post-Arafat era. Clearly, the President has decided to spend
"political capital" to help the moderate Palestinian leadership in its
contest over political succession as an essential step along the Road
Map peace process.
On the Road Again with Rice
Now that George W. Bush has been reelected president, the dormant Road
Map peace plan- developed by the U.S., Russia, the U.N. and the
European Union-is again the frame of reference for deliberations about
U.S. pressure on Israel and the Palestinians. The plan, developed in
2002 and launched in March 2003, lays out the goal - "an independent,
democratic, and viable Palestinian state living side-by-side in peace
and security with Israel and its other neighbors. The settlement will
resolve the Israel-Palestinian conflict, and end the occupation that
began in 1967, based on the foundations of the Madrid conference, the
principle of land for peace, UNSCRs 242, 338 and 1397" (for this and
other documents, go to "resources" at
www.cmep.org)
Bush is
consolidating his power, eliminating dissent and debate, by placing
political appointees in key positions. Secretary of State Powell
disagreed with the administration, wanting a harder line with Sharon,
with little effect. But no one in the Administration is closer to the
President than Condoleezza Rice, who will move from head of National
Security Council to the top slot at State. Ron Kampas of the Jewish
Telegraphic Agency (JTA) posits that "a tighter ship in Washington
means an easier ride when the two nations are in agreement - and more
pointed pressure when they are not."
Diana Buttu, a legal adviser to the Palestinian negotiating
team, told JTA that Rice's reputation as adamantly pro-Israel may be
over- blown. Buttu said that Rice "got it" when the P.A. team
presented her with a map showing Jewish settlement in the West Bank
and a projected route of the security fence that would have sliced up
the area. As a result, intense U.S. pressure led Israel to change the
route, bringing portions of the separation barrier closer to the Green
Line (the pre-1967 boundary of Israel).
During his
reelection campaign, while courting supporters of Israel among Jewish
and conservative Christian voters in Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania,
President Bush didn't talk of Israel's need to make concessions. But
Rice's speech to a national AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs
Committee) meeting in Florida a few days before the election gave
notice that Israel must "take steps to support the emergence of a
viable Palestinian state." Rice's relationship with Brent Scowcroft,
her mentor and a close associate of the President's father, is
remembered. Scowcroft , in a Washington Post op-ed on November
12, made extraordinary policy recommendations: "The United States
should insist that Israel stop construction of its wall on the West
Bank and mirror its withdrawal from Gaza with the evacuation of the
West Bank. In return, the wall and Israeli troops would be replaced by
an international force, principally European or perhaps NATO
troops."
Election on Fast Track
Palestinian elections, and the preparation process, fit neatly into
the Road Map plan. The target date for the establishment of the state
of Palestine was an opening question in the new debate. Palestinian
Prime Minister Qurei pointed to the Road Map's vision of a state in
2005, saying that President Bush's projection of a Palestinian state
by 2009, "will allow Israel to continue building settlements and
swallowing more Palestinian land" to build the wall.
For the
elections, Palestinians will need to move freely throughout the West
Bank and Gaza, requiring Israel to remove roadblocks and military
checkpoints, withdraw troops from the territories and end military
incursions. The involvement of international monitors is certain and
will bring the long-sought presence of third party observers to the
occupied land. It is expected that some members of the House of
Representatives will join the National Democratic Institute
contingent. The election agenda should start a flow of economic and
technical support for the elections from the U.S., the E.U. and Arab
states, which will alleviate the worsening poverty of the
Palestinians.
Voting by
Palestinians in East Jerusalem is essential for elections to be deemed
legitimate. How this is done will provide an early test of U.S.
diplomatic resolve. Though Jerusalemites have the same legal status as
Palestinians in the rest of the Occupied Territories, Israel resists
an election modality that weakens its claim of sovereignty over the
Jerusalem neighborhoods and suburbs that it annexed. Voter
registration concluded on October 13, but Israel did not allow
registration in East Jerusalem. In 1996, East Jerusalem Palestinians
went to the post office, and inserted their ballots, for president and
for the legislative council, into separate ballot boxes, which were
taken to Jerusalem suburbs for counting. Ahmed Qurei, the current
prime minister, is an elected Jerusalem representative as is Hanan
Ashrawi, a Christian woman popular in the United States.
With President
Arafat gone, competition within the nationalist movement between
"young guard" and "old guard," and between nationalists and Islamists
could result in internal infighting if the election process is not
seen as credible. Certainly there needs to be an internal Palestinian
agreement among all the factions on a ceasefire during the campaign
and on election-day itself. And, of course, the Israelis need to
respect this internal ceasefire by observing a cease fire of their own
and by stopping incursions and assassinations. There are early reports
that Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom recognizes that new
Palestinian leaders will not be able to halt terrorism "with the push
of a button" and that an end of incitement to violence in its mass
media would demonstrate good intentions. A decision by Israel to
release political prisoners would provide immediate evidence to all
factions of the benefit of a new Palestinian leadership and a new
strategic approach to Israel.
Let us keep in
mind that, however important Palestinian elections are, the underlying
causes of the conflict must be addressed. Public confidence that the
occupation will end is crucial to the success of Palestinian
governance and stopping violence. Transforming public opinion toward
hope for peace, along with popular recognition that violence against
Israeli citizens blocks peacemaking, is the best way to prevent
terrorism.
Expanding Settlements
The Road Map's demand that Israel "immediately" dismantle settlement
outposts and freeze all settlement activity, including the "natural
growth" of settlements has been ignored and settlements have grown.
Peace Now, an Israeli group that monitors settlements, has documented
continued expansion of settlements and outposts, including settlements
designated to be evacuated under the Gaza disengagement plan.
Expansion includes new homes, roads and farm land.
Despite the
fact that Israeli ministries have funded the establishment and
maintenance of settlement outposts, the U.S. government has failed in
2004 to deduct sums for Israeli government investments in the occupied
territories from the amount of the U.S. loan guarantees made available
to Israel. Continued tolerance by the Bush Administration of Israel's
non-implementation of the Road Map's clear directive regarding
settlements would give dangerous signals to Palestinians and Israelis
that Mr. Bush's support of peacemaking is only rhetorical.
The President
will need to show quickly that he means business. Without visible
changes on the ground, neither Palestinians nor the international
community will be convinced. Indicators would be deductions from the
amount of U.S. loan guarantees and insisting that Israel comply with
the Road Map's requirements relative to other settlements and outposts
in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. In the April 2004 exchange of
letters, P.M. Sharon committed to evacuate the unauthorized outposts.
But the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv reports that Israel has failed to
keep its promise. Also, firm action by the President would strengthen
P.M. Sharon's hand against the fierce opposition of the settler
movement to the evacuation of Gaza settlements.
Support for the
Administration serving as a credible, evenhanded broker came from key
U.S. Jewish leaders, in a letter to Ms. Rice organized by the Israel
Policy Forum. The signers asserted that "this is the right time for
Israel to fulfill its commitments to stop settlement activity." Rabbi
Eric Yoffie, president of the Union for Reform Judaism, and Rabbi
Jerome Epstein, executive vice president of The United Synagogue of
Conservative Judaism, were among the more than 70 signers.
Gaza Disengagement
P.M. Sharon's plan
to vacate settlers from Gaza and a few settlements in the northern
West Bank began as a unilateral move disconnected from the Road Map.
But in this new political climate, the Gaza Disengagement plan, now
stumbling through Israel's political maze, could be a positive first
step, but only if it is a FIRST step followed by negotiations toward
disengagement from the West Bank as well, and an independent, viable
state based on UN resolutions. Palestinians will not be pacified by a
Palestinian state composed only of Gaza and part of the northern West
Bank, severed from East Jerusalem, with Israel sealing the borders and
denying Gaza access to a seaport and an airport. The Arab states and
people would reject such an outcome, ending the comprehensive
resolution that offers Israel security.
The grand excuse of P.M. Sharon, that Israel had no partner for peace
with Arafat in power, has evaporated. Now, new Palestinian leadership
might see opportunity instead of conspiracy in the disengagement plan
and engage in negotiations, with Quartet support, on the withdrawal.
Rather than the feared aftermath of anarchy in Gaza, it is now
feasible that the Palestinian Authority can rebuild its security
apparatus and consolidate authority if Israel stops military
incursions, house demolitions and assassinations in Gaza.
Unless there is
recognition that political negotiations will lead to the end of the
occupation and a viable Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its
capital, the Palestinian elections-key to the President's ambitions
for democracy-will not bring an end to the conflict.
SUGGESTED ACTION:
Administration:
Keep in mind that it is the White House that has the
authority to make and carry out foreign policy. All signals are that
now, in his second term, President Bush is ready to engage in an
Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The White House needs evidence of
support and encouragement from citizens. As we know, this President
places great emphasis on faith-based advocacy, so reference to your
Christianity is suitable, and a useful counter to the lobbying of
Christian Zionists.
There are many issues and principles that could and must be brought to
the attention of policymakers. Churches for Middle East Peace
addresses many aspects of the requirements of a just peace in letters
and meetings with the Administration, as do many of the leaders of the
U.S. churches in the CMEP coalition. However, the ordinary citizen
advocate is wise to focus each message on a few specific points. One
way that public opinion is measured is by tabulating communications to
the White House. Call the White House comment line 202-456-1111 or
send an email to
president@whitehouse.gov with the following message:
President Bush's support for Palestinian elections and his
commitment to a Palestinian state living at peace with
Israel is good
news. I appeal to the President to make clear that East Jerusalem
must be part of the state of Palestine for it to be viable. Hope for
peace in the Holy Land and a shared Jerusalem would be a wonderful
Christmas gift for the nation and the world.
Congress:
Congress can either encourage or block the Administration's
initiatives. The White House is likely to look to the Senate for
congressional backing, where the Majority and Minority Leaders were
quickly called into service on November 19 to sponsor a resolution
commending the Bush-Blair joint statement. There are a number of
Senators, both Republican and Democratic, who are serious about
foreign policy and recognize the dangers and opportunities of the
present moment for Israel and the Palestinians. This time, before and
in the opening weeks of the new session in January, is opportune to
organize a meeting with your senators at one of their state offices.
At a face-to-face meeting, additional issues can be discussed, such as
the importance of freezing settlements and not allowing the separation
barrier to take Palestinian land. Emphasize that a negotiated
two-state resolution is good for Israel, the Palestinians and the
people of the United States.
For both your senators and representative, a Christmas card with your
handwritten message is a creative mode of advocacy. Mail your card - a
Bethlehem crèche scene would be perfect - with your note to their
local office or Washington office. Suggested messages:
1.) Encourage Congress to support the elections in Palestine and to do
everything it can to help a new Palestinian government succeed and
provide hope to both Israelis and Palestinians of a peaceful future.
2.) Write that in this season of peace, you believe that the most
important step towards ending terrorism in the world is an even-handed
settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. |