|
March 14, 2005
TO: Congressional staff with foreign policy
responsibilities
FROM: Churches for Middle East Peace
RE: Bethlehem, Jerusalem and the barrier
We bring your attention to the
catastrophic effect that Israel’s building of a separation barrier is
having on the town of Bethlehem, as explained by Mayor Hanna Nasser in
a letter to Churches for Middle East Peace.
The Mayor writes about Israel
confiscating Palestinian land and building a 25 foot high concrete
barrier between Bethlehem and Rachel’s Tomb which lies at the entry to
Bethlehem along the road that links Bethlehem to Jerusalem. This
barrier prevents Palestinian Christians from access to their places of
worship whether at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem or
the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. The sites associated with
Jesus’ birth, life, crucifixion and resurrection become physically
separated by the barrier, detracting from the wholeness, accessibility
and sanctity of Bethlehem and Jerusalem for faithful worshipers and
visiting pilgrims. Similarly, the barrier and closure of Jerusalem
prevents the freedom of worship of Palestinian Muslims.
Bethlehem, the birthplace of
Jesus, is home to the largest Palestinian Christian community,
estimated at around 20,000, and is one of the most revered Christian
holy sites. In fact, Bethlehem is totally dependent upon the tourist
business. Located just 8 miles apart, Bethlehem and Jerusalem have
long been twin attractions for pilgrims and tourists from all over. If
the barrier and Israeli military checkpoints cordon Bethlehem off from
Jerusalem, the economic catastrophe that will take place will
certainly contribute to a dramatic dwindling of the Christian
Palestinian numbers, 3,000 of whom have left in the past four years.
It would be a tragedy of historic proportions for Christianity if
Bethlehem, after two millennia, lost its Christian population.
Something must be done to ensure that Bethlehem is an open town and
that people can come and go freely.
While Israel has a legitimate
right to protect its citizens, the barrier, here and inside other
parts of the West Bank, inflicts severe hardship on Palestinian life.
For this reason, the International Court of Justice, the Israeli High
Court and officials of the United States government have demanded
changes in the route of the barrier.
The barrier in and around
Jerusalem appears to be designed as a de facto border. It is
clear that the government of Israel intends to prejudge negotiations
on the status of the city, making it impossible for Jerusalem to serve
as the capital of both Israel and the future state of Palestine.
Without an agreed solution for sharing Jerusalem, there will be
neither peace nor a Palestinian state. Nor is there any future for
the little town of Bethlehem if it is isolated and cut off from
Jerusalem.
Congress should back the
Administration’s request that the barrier’s route not prejudge final
status negotiations, including a negotiated agreement on the status of
Jerusalem. |